AMD Radeon HD 6290 vs NVIDIA NVS 3100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6290 and NVIDIA NVS 3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6290

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 606 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 46.98 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 595 vs 578
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 595 vs 578
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1185 vs 988
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1185 vs 988

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 3100M

• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 19 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 35 vs 32
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 115 vs 105
• 13.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2905 vs 220

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6290
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 3100M

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	32 35
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	105 115
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	220 2905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	595 578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	595 578
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1185 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1185 988

Compare specifications (specs)