AMD Radeon HD 6350A vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6350A and NVIDIA Quadro 400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350A
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 32 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1540 MHz
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1540 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 400
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 108 gflops vs 104 gflops
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 108 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6350A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 400
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6350A | NVIDIA Quadro 400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6350A | NVIDIA Quadro 400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cedar | GT216 |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 | 5 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1608 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Price now | $145.55 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 108 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 32 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 12.32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1540 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |