AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
• 4.8x better floating-point performance: 141.76 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 80 nm
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 255 vs 169
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 146 vs 38
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1434 vs 1016
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1434 vs 1016

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

• 3.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 443 MHz
• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 billion / sec vs 3.54 GTexel / s
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1796 vs 873
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1796 vs 873

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	255 169
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	146 38
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	873 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	873 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1434 1016
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1434 1016

Compare specifications (specs)