AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP

NVIDIA Quadro 600

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm

Launch date	1 November 2011 vs 13 December 2010
Pipelines	160 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 40 nm

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

Around 44% higher core clock speed: 640 MHz vs 443 MHz
2.9x more texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 3.54 GTexel / s
Around 73% better floating-point performance: 245.76 gflops vs 141.76 gflops
Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 530 vs 255
Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 146
5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2104 vs 422
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1255 vs 873
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1255 vs 873
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1434
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1434

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	640 MHz vs 443 MHz
Texture fill rate	10.24 GTexel / s vs 3.54 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	245.76 gflops vs 141.76 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	530 vs 255
PassMark - G2D Mark	232 vs 146
Geekbench - OpenCL	2104 vs 422
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1255 vs 873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1255 vs 873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2037 vs 1434
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2037 vs 1434

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

255

530

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

146

232

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

422

2104

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

873

1255

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

873

1255

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1434

2037

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1434

2037

Name	AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro 600
PassMark - G3D Mark	255	530
PassMark - G2D Mark	146	232
Geekbench - OpenCL	422	2104
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	873	1255
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	873	1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1434	2037
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1434	2037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		899

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro 600
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	WinterPark	GF108
Launch date	1 November 2011	13 December 2010
Place in performance rating	1463	1465
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$179
Price now		$299
Value for money (0-100)		2.80
Technical info
Core clock speed	443 MHz	640 MHz
Floating-point performance	141.76 gflops	245.76 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	160	96
Texture fill rate	3.54 GTexel / s	10.24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	40 Watt
Transistor count	1,180 million	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		168 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1600 MHz