AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date | 1 November 2011 vs 13 December 2010 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 640 MHz vs 443 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 3.54 GTexel / s
- Around 73% better floating-point performance: 245.76 gflops vs 141.76 gflops
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 533 vs 255
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 146
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2074 vs 422
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1255 vs 873
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1255 vs 873
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1434
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1434
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 640 MHz vs 443 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s vs 3.54 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops vs 141.76 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 533 vs 255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 146 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2074 vs 422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 vs 873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 vs 873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 vs 1434 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 vs 1434 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP | NVIDIA Quadro 600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 255 | 533 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 146 | 232 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 422 | 2074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 873 | 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 873 | 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1434 | 2037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1434 | 2037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | WinterPark | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 | 13 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1464 | 1466 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $299 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 443 MHz | 640 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.76 gflops | 245.76 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 3.54 GTexel / s | 10.24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,180 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz |