AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP and NVIDIA NVS 2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 7.09 GTexel / s vs 4.28 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 320 vs 16
- 7.2x better floating-point performance: 283.52 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 337 vs 140
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1614 vs 1249
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1614 vs 1249
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 June 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 7.09 GTexel / s vs 4.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 283.52 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 337 vs 140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1614 vs 1249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1614 vs 1249 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 2100M
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 535 MHz vs 443 MHz
- 5.9x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 136
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2609 vs 876
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 535 MHz vs 443 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 vs 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2609 vs 876 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP | NVIDIA NVS 2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 337 | 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 876 | 2609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1104 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1104 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1614 | 1249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1614 | 1249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP | NVIDIA NVS 2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | BeaverCreek | GT218 |
Launch date | 20 June 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1470 | 1473 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 443 MHz | 535 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 283.52 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 7.09 GTexel / s | 4.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,450 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 |