AMD Radeon HD 6650M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6650M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6650M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 3.8x more pipelines: 480 vs 128
• Around 49% better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 753 vs 598
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 224 vs 57

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3108 vs 1866
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3108 vs 1866
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3334
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3334

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	753 598
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	224 57
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1866 3108
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1866 3108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3351

Compare specifications (specs)