AMD Radeon HD 6970M vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6970M and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 960 vs 640
  • Around 36% better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3200 MHz
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2270 vs 898
  • 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 97
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 January 2011 vs 28 April 2009
Texture fill rate 32.6 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 640
Floating-point performance 1,305.6 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2270 vs 898
PassMark - G2D Mark 656 vs 97

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770

  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 680 MHz
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3342
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3342
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 750 MHz vs 680 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8618 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8618 vs 3342

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6970M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2270
898
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
656
97
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3342
8618
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3342
8618
Name AMD Radeon HD 6970M ATI Radeon HD 4770
PassMark - G3D Mark 2270 898
PassMark - G2D Mark 656 97
Geekbench - OpenCL 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 617.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 117.801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3342 8618
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3342 8618

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6970M ATI Radeon HD 4770

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 TeraScale
Code name Blackcomb RV740
Launch date 4 January 2011 28 April 2009
Place in performance rating 780 783
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $109

Technical info

Core clock speed 680 MHz 750 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,305.6 gflops 960.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 960 640
Texture fill rate 32.6 GTexel / s 24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 1,700 million 826 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Length 203 mm

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.4 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 115.2 GB / s 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0