NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and AMD Radeon HD 6970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.784 vs 4.787
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 617.819
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 0.927
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 24.456
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 4 January 2011 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 vs 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 vs 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 vs 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 24.456 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970M
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 960 vs 448
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3132 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.801 vs 93.533
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 444
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2270 vs 1306
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 3132 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.801 vs 93.533 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 444 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2270 vs 1306 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | AMD Radeon HD 6970M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 | 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 | 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 | 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | 24.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 | 117.801 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 656 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | 2270 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | AMD Radeon HD 6970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF100 | Blackcomb |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 4 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Place in performance rating | 788 | 790 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 680 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | 32.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |