AMD Radeon HD 6990 vs ATI FireGL V5600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6990 and ATI FireGL V5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 830 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 43.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 25.6x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 120
- 26.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2200 MHz
- 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3014 vs 341
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 445
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2204
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2204
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 March 2011 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 830 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 120 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3014 vs 341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2204 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2204 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V5600
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 375 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6990
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V5600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | ATI FireGL V5600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3014 | 341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.264 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.76 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.903 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4562 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2204 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4562 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2204 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6990 | ATI FireGL V5600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Antilles | RV630 |
| Launch date | 8 March 2011 | 28 June 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $599 |
| Place in performance rating | 644 | 645 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 830 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 120 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | 89 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,640 million | 390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 295 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
