AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6990

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 830 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 375 Watt
• Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 3014
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.283 vs 17.264
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.437 vs 1.76
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.718 vs 53.903

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990

• 5.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 768
• 3.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 460
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 840.452 vs 815.354
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 vs 171.258
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4562 vs 4468
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3667
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4562 vs 4468
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3667

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3032 3014
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.283 17.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	815.354 840.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.437 1.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.718 53.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.258 265.302
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4468 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4468 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3356

Compare specifications (specs)