AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 80 vs 72
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 43 Watt
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 63
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 2 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 72 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 43 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 63 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 80% better floating-point performance: 187.49 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 465 vs 165
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 2802
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2502 vs 1763
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 1763
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 187.49 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 465 vs 165 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 vs 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 vs 1763 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 63 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 165 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2802 | 8132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 746 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 746 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1763 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 | 2502 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cedar | GT215 |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 2 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1472 | 1473 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 187.49 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 43 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 175 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 25.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |