NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 8x better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 vs 401
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 vs 746
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 1763
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 November 2013 vs 5 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 833.3 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 vs 401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 vs 746 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 1763 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 401 vs 51
- 15.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 746 vs 47
- 29.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1763 vs 59.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 401 vs 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 746 vs 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 vs 59.6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.793 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.139 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 | 401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 | 746 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 1763 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 51 | 401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 47 | 746 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 59.6 | 1763 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 165 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2802 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK107 | Cedar |
| Launch date | 8 November 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1471 | 1472 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1085 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 833.3 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIANVS 5100M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 320 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 7350 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro K420
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R6 M335DX
