Intel HD Graphics 5500 vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5500 and AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 594 vs 165
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 187
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 781 vs 401
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 754 vs 746
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 vs 401
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 754 vs 746
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 5 January 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 vs 165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 vs 746 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
- 6.5x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 80 vs 24
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2802 vs 2262
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1763 vs 1397
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1763 vs 1397
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2802 vs 2262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1763 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 vs 1397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 | 165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2262 | 2802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 | 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 | 1763 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | Cedar |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1478 | 1481 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 80 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 292 million |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |