AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 160 vs 80
- Around 92% better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 104 gflops
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 19 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1066 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 224 vs 141
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 443 vs 381
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 919 vs 734
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 443 vs 381
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 919 vs 734
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 7 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 224 vs 141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 443 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 919 vs 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 443 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 919 vs 734 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 145
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2872 vs 635
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1717 vs 1626
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1717 vs 1626
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 145 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 vs 635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 vs 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 vs 1626 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6350
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 224 | 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 145 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 635 | 2872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.563 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 443 | 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 919 | 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 | 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 443 | 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 919 | 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 | 1717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.131 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Caicos | Cedar |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 7 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1523 | 1544 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $23 | |
Price now | $50.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.528 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |