AMD Radeon HD 7450M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7450M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 30.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 405
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3317
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3317
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 26 March 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 3317 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 34.0 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 448 vs 160
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 1,088.6 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 1 GB
- 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3107 vs 330
- 23x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10940 vs 476
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1832
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3107 vs 330 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10940 vs 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 vs 1832 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 330 | 3107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 405 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 476 | 10940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1832 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1832 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 | 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 | 3317 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.93 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.852 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7450M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Seymour | GF100 |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 26 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 809 | 810 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $522.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 224.0 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 34.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 3,100 million |
CUDA cores | 448 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 133.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |