AMD Radeon RX 640 vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 6960.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 24x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11437 vs 476
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2070 vs 330
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 7 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 160 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11437 vs 476 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2070 vs 330 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1832 vs 1769
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1832 vs 1769
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 2775
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 2775
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1832 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1832 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 2775 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 342 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11437 | 476 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 342 | 441 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2070 | 330 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | Seymour |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 7 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 809 | 811 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 160 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 370 million |
| Floating-point performance | 224.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
