AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later

Launch date	2 October 2012 vs 1 June 2012

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Around 12% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 760 MHz
Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
Around 12% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 782 vs 331
Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 127
Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1690 vs 1092
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1153
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1153
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2297 vs 2177
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2297 vs 2177

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 760 MHz
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	782 vs 331
PassMark - G2D Mark	250 vs 127
Geekbench - OpenCL	1690 vs 1092
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2297 vs 2177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2297 vs 2177

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

331

782

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

127

250

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1092

1690

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1153

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1153

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2177

2297

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2177

2297

Name	AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	331	782
PassMark - G2D Mark	127	250
Geekbench - OpenCL	1092	1690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1153	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1153	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2177	2297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2177	2297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1162

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Scrapper	GK107
Launch date	2 October 2012	1 June 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$67	$119.90
Place in performance rating	1396	1397
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Price now		$149.90
Value for money (0-100)		6.18
Technical info
Core clock speed	760 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	291.8 gflops	326.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	192
Texture fill rate	9.12 GTexel / s	13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,303 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Shared memory		0