AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
Around 15% better floating-point performance: 291.8 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm

Launch date	2 October 2012 vs 22 March 2012
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Floating-point performance	291.8 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 40 nm

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 333
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 129
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 vs 1061
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1153
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1153
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2177
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2177

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	532 vs 333
PassMark - G2D Mark	152 vs 129
Geekbench - OpenCL	2387 vs 1061
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2766 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2766 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 2177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 2177

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

333

532

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

129

152

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1061

2387

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1153

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1153

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2177

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2177

3359

Name	AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark	333	532
PassMark - G2D Mark	129	152
Geekbench - OpenCL	1061	2387
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1153	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1153	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2177	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2177	3359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		967
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		967
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Fermi
Code name	Scrapper	GF108
Launch date	2 October 2012	22 March 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$67
Place in performance rating	1389	1390
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	760 MHz
Floating-point performance	291.8 gflops	253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	96
Texture fill rate	9.12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	1,303 million	585 million
CUDA cores		96
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-A (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
DirectX 11.2		12 API
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus