NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 710M

AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
Around 2% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 333
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2457 vs 1061
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1153
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2177
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1153
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2177

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 July 2013 vs 2 October 2012
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	454 vs 333
Geekbench - OpenCL	2457 vs 1061
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3075 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3325 vs 2177
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3075 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3325 vs 2177

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 719 MHz
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 125

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	760 MHz vs 719 MHz
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	129 vs 125

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

454

333

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

125

129

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2457

1061

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3075

1153

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3325

2177

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3075

1153

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3325

2177

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 710M	AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark	454	333
PassMark - G2D Mark	125	129
Geekbench - OpenCL	2457	1061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	148.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	19.855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3075	1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3325	2177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3075	1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3325	2177
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 710M	AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	TeraScale 3
Code name	GK208	Scrapper
Launch date	24 July 2013	2 October 2012
Place in performance rating	1387	1389
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$67
Technical info
Boost clock speed	800 MHz
Core clock speed	719 MHz	760 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	291.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	96	192
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	9.12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1,303 million
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 2560x1600
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 2560x1600
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	IGP
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12 API	11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	DDR3
Technologies
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus