AMD Radeon HD 7610M vs AMD Radeon HD 6970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7610M and AMD Radeon HD 6970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 27.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 550 Watt
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1375 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 429
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 14 December 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 550 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1375 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 429 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970
- 9.4x more texture fill rate: 84.5 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 400
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 2,703.4 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2836 vs 632
- 6.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35739 vs 5257
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2632
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2632
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3339
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 84.5 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,703.4 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2836 vs 632 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 vs 5257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | AMD Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 632 | 2836 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | 429 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5257 | 35739 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2632 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2632 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5372 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5372 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7610M | AMD Radeon HD 6970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | Whistler | Cayman |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 14 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 674 | 675 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $369 | |
| Price now | $94.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 48.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | 2,703.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 84.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 2,640 million |
| Boost clock speed | 880 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7610M with others
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5250
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
