NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 5220x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 9 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 640 vs 400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 632
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12508 vs 5257
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2632
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3339
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2632
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 7 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 400 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 vs 632 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12508 vs 5257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 241
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 241 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 632 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 479 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12508 | 5257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GP107 | Whistler |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 7 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 681 | 667 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 400 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 716 million |
| Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
