AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand vs AMD FirePro M4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand and AMD FirePro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand
- Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4000
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 576.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4000
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand | AMD FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.659 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 424.37 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.072 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 79.304 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2189 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2189 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand | AMD FirePro M4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Whistler | Chelsea |
| Launch date | 1 July 2012 | 27 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 935 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
