AMD Radeon HD 7990 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7990 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7990
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 405 MHz
- 131.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 16.2 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 320
- 15.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,096 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.4x more maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 1792 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5566 vs 2060
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 426
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 April 2013 vs 27 July 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 405 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 16.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops vs 518.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 1792 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 vs 2060 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 426 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5249 vs 3712
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7205 vs 3356
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5249 vs 3712
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7205 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5249 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7205 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5249 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7205 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7990
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 | 2060 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 88.665 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1753.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.328 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 434.598 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6689 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 5249 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 7205 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6689 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 5249 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 7205 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7990 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Malta | GF100 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch date | 24 April 2013 | 27 July 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 421 | 419 |
| Price now | $1,126.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 405 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 16.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 307 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 3 GB | 1792 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2x 288.0 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7990 with others
AMDRadeon HD 7990 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
AMDRadeon HD 7990 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000M
AMDRadeon HD 7990 vs
NVIDIATesla K20m
AMDRadeon HD 7990 vs
AMDRadeon R7 370
AMDRadeon HD 7990 vs
AppleM1 8-core
AMDRadeon HD 7990 vs
AppleM1 7-core
