AMD Radeon HD 7990 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7990 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7990

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 706 MHz
• 14.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 146.8 GTexel / s
• Around 64% higher pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2496
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,096 gflops vs 3,524 gflops
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5566 vs 4432
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 210
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 88.665 vs 54.89
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1753.494 vs 1414.755
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.437 vs 5.303
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.328 vs 83.807
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 434.598 vs 250.291

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 375 Watt
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8319 vs 6689
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3712
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3356
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8319 vs 6689
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3712
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7990
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5566 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	766 210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	88.665 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1753.494 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.437 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	88.328 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	434.598 250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6689 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6689 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 10873

Compare specifications (specs)