AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 48 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 vs 10 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 vs 30 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 250 vs 248
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 vs 248 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 | 30 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 | 250 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.342 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 121.217 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.947 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1891 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1891 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
Code name | Caicos | RV730 |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 | 10 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1595 | 1586 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 193 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |