AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM and NVIDIA NVS 310 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 523 MHz
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 6.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 248.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1750 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 121.217 vs 76.391
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.14 vs 4.974
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.947 vs 7.835
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 vs 26 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1750 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 121.217 vs 76.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.14 vs 4.974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.947 vs 7.835 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 310
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 178 vs 168
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 881 vs 785
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.991 vs 2.342
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 vs 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 881 vs 785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 vs 2.342 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 310
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | NVIDIA NVS 310 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 | 178 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 251 | 251 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 785 | 881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.342 | 2.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 121.217 | 76.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.275 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.14 | 4.974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.947 | 7.835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | NVIDIA NVS 310 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Caicos | GF119 |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 | 26 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1585 | 1586 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 523 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | 100.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | 4.184 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 156 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 14 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |