AMD Radeon HD 8570D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 vs 46
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2966 vs 1385
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2966 vs 1385
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 17 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 256 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 vs 46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2966 vs 1385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2966 vs 1385 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 844 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 501 vs 438
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9236 vs 1495
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1979 vs 1924
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1979 vs 1924
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 844 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 501 vs 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 vs 1495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 vs 1924 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 vs 1924 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8570D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 | 501 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 46 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1495 | 9236 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1924 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2966 | 1385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1924 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2966 | 1385 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8570D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Richland | GT215 |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 17 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1337 | 1394 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Price now | $37.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 844 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 96 |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | |
Transistor count | 727 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.2 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB or 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |