Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570D

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon HD 8570D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 926 vs 431
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 157
  • 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4185 vs 1489
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 843
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2966
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 843
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2966
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 26 September 2012
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 926 vs 431
PassMark - G2D Mark 218 vs 157
Geekbench - OpenCL 4185 vs 1489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 vs 843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 2966
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 vs 843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 2966

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570D

  • 2.8x more core clock speed: 844 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 24
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1924 vs 1733
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1924 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 844 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 256 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1924 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1924 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
926
431
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
218
157
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4185
1489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2966
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2966
Name Intel HD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon HD 8570D
PassMark - G3D Mark 926 431
PassMark - G2D Mark 218 157
Geekbench - OpenCL 4185 1489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1733 1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 2966
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1733 1924
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 2966
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 343 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon HD 8570D

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Terascale 3
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Richland
Launch date 30 August 2016 26 September 2012
Place in performance rating 1334 1336
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 844 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 24 256
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync