Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon HD 8570D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 927 vs 432
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 158
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4185 vs 1489
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 843
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2966
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 843
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2966
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 26 September 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 927 vs 432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 158 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4185 vs 1489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2966 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570D
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 844 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 24
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1924 vs 1733
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1924 vs 1733
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 844 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 256 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1924 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1924 vs 1733 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8570D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 927 | 432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 158 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4185 | 1489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 1924 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 1924 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2966 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8570D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Richland |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 26 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1334 | 1336 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 844 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |