AMD Radeon HD 8570D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 4 May 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 704 vs 438
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 160
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2344 vs 1495
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 vs 843
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 vs 1924
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3127 vs 2966
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 vs 843
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 vs 1924
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3127 vs 2966
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 704 vs 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 vs 1495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 vs 1924 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 vs 2966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 vs 1924 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 vs 2966 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8570D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 | 704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1495 | 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 843 | 1583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1924 | 2289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2966 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 843 | 1583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1924 | 2289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2966 | 3127 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8570D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Richland | GF108 |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 4 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1337 | 1340 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $849.99 | |
Price now | $849.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 844 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |