AMD Radeon HD 8570M vs NVIDIA GeForce 615
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570M and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 660 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 16.5 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 528.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5101 vs 1323
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1011 vs 668
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2059 vs 1286
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2214 vs 1708
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1011 vs 668
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2059 vs 1286
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2214 vs 1708
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 660 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 16.5 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5101 vs 1323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1011 vs 668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2059 vs 1286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2214 vs 1708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1011 vs 668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2059 vs 1286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2214 vs 1708 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 450
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 164
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 507 vs 450 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 vs 164 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8570M | NVIDIA GeForce 615 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 450 | 507 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 | 292 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5101 | 1323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1011 | 668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2059 | 1286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2214 | 1708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1011 | 668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2059 | 1286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2214 | 1708 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.257 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8570M | NVIDIA GeForce 615 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Sun | GF108 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1324 | 1326 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops | 126.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.5 GTexel / s | 5.28 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |