AMD Radeon HD 8690M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8690M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 589
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 23 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 589 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4142 vs 984
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12188 vs 5079
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3571 vs 1813
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3571 vs 1813
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3178
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3178
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 vs 1579
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 vs 1579
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4142 vs 984 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12188 vs 5079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 vs 1579 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8690M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8690M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 984 | 4142 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 589 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5079 | 12188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3178 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3178 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1579 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1579 | 5683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8690M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Sun | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 23 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 612 | 613 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 720 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 16.5 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3540 Million |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |