AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM vs ATI Radeon X300 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM and ATI Radeon X300 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 79.7x more texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 64 MB
- 12.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 73.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2785 vs 38
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2785 vs 38 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 vs 242 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X300 SE
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X300 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | ATI Radeon X300 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2785 | 38 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.334 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | ATI Radeon X300 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Tahiti | RV370 |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 720 | 717 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.0 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |