NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3461 vs 2785
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 40.311
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 3.328
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 4396
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 4396
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 vs 8 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3461 vs 2785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 vs 40.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 vs 3.328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 vs 4396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 vs 4396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 340
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13773 vs 8148
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.334 vs 782.113
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.205 vs 51.048
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.508 vs 172.896
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops vs 1,405 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 vs 340 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13773 vs 8148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.334 vs 782.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 vs 51.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.508 vs 172.896 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3461 | 2785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | 13773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | 40.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | 795.334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | 3.328 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | 64.205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 | 181.508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | 4396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 | 4396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 | 8 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 719 | 720 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 3,315 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | 103.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |