AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 513 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 768 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 152 Watt
- Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12516 vs 7468
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 vs 16.451
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 511.131
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 1.925
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 17.065
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 46.591
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 2602
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3316
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 2602
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 23 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 513 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 352 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 152 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12516 vs 7468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 vs 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 vs 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3316 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3104 vs 2350
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3104 vs 2350
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3104 vs 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3104 vs 2350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12516 | 7468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3316 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1932 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 23 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 981 | 978 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $268 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 513 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 352 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 152 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 722.3 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 22.57 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2560 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s |