AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs AMD Radeon R9 M275
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and AMD Radeon R9 M275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12693 vs 9231
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 vs 28.064
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 313.463
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 2.206
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 34.381
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 121.685
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 1162
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1717
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 1162
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1717
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 28 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12693 vs 9231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 vs 28.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 vs 313.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 2.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 34.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 121.685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1717 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | AMD Radeon R9 M275 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12693 | 9231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 28.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 313.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 2.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 34.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 121.685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1717 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | AMD Radeon R9 M275 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Venus |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 28 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 986 | 989 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799.99 | |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 |