AMD Radeon Pro 555X versus NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 555X and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 77% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 907 MHz versus 513 MHz
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 352
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 152 Watt
- Environ 70% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5100 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12516 versus 7468
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 versus 16.451
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 versus 511.131
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 versus 1.925
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 versus 17.065
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 versus 46.591
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 versus 2602
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3316
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 versus 2602
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3316
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 versus 23 February 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz versus 513 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 versus 352 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 152 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12516 versus 7468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 versus 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 versus 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 versus 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 versus 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 versus 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 versus 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 versus 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3316 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3104 versus 2350
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3104 versus 2350
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3104 versus 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3104 versus 2350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12516 | 7468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3316 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1932 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 | 23 February 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 981 | 978 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $268 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 513 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 352 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 152 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 722.3 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.57 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 248 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 2560 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 120.0 GB / s |