AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 3720
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 3720
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3374
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3374
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 3374 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 4608 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1018 vs 525
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25034 vs 12258
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16849 vs 13220
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16849 vs 13220
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151497 vs 62815
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1018 vs 525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25034 vs 12258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 vs 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 vs 13220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151497 vs 62815 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 1018 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12258 | 25034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 | 3374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62815 | 151497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19444 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 12 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 66 | 69 |
Type | Server | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.373 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |