AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 400x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5040 vs 4413
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 468
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26669 vs 15375
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8311 vs 3285
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8311 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 16 August 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5040 vs 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 vs 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26669 vs 15375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1663
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5040 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26669 | 15375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Vega 12 | GK104 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 16 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 483 | 701 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1344 | |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |