AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98432 vs 39403
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 10959
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 10959
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 576
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 7877
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 30 April 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 vs 39403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 576 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 7877 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 5x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 | 39403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 576 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 7877 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3597 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
| Code name | Vega 20 | TU107 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 161 | 359 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
