AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • 2.6x more core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1350 MHz
  • Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 83044
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 584
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 13640
Specifications (specs)
Launch date Dec 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1574 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1720 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines 4096 vs 3072
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 16 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 99542 vs 83044
PassMark - G2D Mark 768 vs 584
PassMark - G3D Mark 15475 vs 13640

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

  • 5.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 475 Watt
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 16149
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 16149
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3100
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3100
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2813
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2813
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 475 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 vs 16149
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 vs 16149
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 2813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 2813

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
99542
83044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16149
19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16149
19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3100
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3100
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2813
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2813
3357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
768
584
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15475
13640
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega II NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL 99542 83044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16149 19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16149 19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3100 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3100 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2813 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2813 3357
PassMark - G2D Mark 768 584
PassMark - G3D Mark 15475 13640
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7879

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.1 Turing
Code name Vega 20 TU104
Launch date Dec 2019 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 166 169
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1720 MHz 1350 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1574 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) 259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) 16.59 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 14.09 TFLOPS 8.294 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4096 3072
Pixel fill rate 110.1 GPixel/s 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s 259.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 475 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 13230 million 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width Dual-slot IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 825.3 GB/s
Memory bus width 4096 bit
Memory clock speed 1612 MHz
Memory type HBM2

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)