AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 7437.5x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 70535
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 6316
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 vs 70535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3100
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3100
- 9.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 2813
- 9.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 2813
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 475 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 2813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 2813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 | 70535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 27566 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega 20 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 166 | 165 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
