NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega II videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 16149
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 16149
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2813 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 748 vs 512
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15597 vs 12490
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99500 vs 78748
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 vs 512 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15597 vs 12490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99500 vs 78748 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 512 | 748 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12490 | 15597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2813 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78748 | 99500 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.1 |
Code name | GA104 | Vega 20 |
Place in performance rating | 177 | 174 |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1720 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4096 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 110.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 440.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 475 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13230 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 825.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |