AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 279x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 11451
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3198
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 11451
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3198
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1246 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- 3.6x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1408
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3555 vs 3463
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3555 vs 3463
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1246 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3555 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3555 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166109 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12633 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Volta |
Code name | Navi 14 | GV100 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 209 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1246 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |