AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 2168
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 2168
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1982
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1982
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123773 vs 39228

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3723 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3723 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 1982
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	123773 39228

Compare specifications (specs)