AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1405 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 1812x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 65520
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3739 vs 3714
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3739 vs 3714
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 4 November 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 12 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 65520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 vs 3714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 W
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 W |
| Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 65520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 3714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 4 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 230 | 227 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Quad-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 11408 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6900X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
