AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- 3898x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 41185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 41185 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 W
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3739
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3739
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 W |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 3739 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 3739 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 41185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 8902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 8902 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9937 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 230 | 233 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1379 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Quad-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6900X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
