AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- 3898x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 41185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 41185 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 W
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3739
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3739
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 W |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 3739 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 3739 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 41185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 8902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 8902 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9934 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 232 | 233 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1379 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Quad-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6900X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
