AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and ATI Radeon HD 5970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3648 vs 2282
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 418
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5431 vs 3977
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5431 vs 3977
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 18 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3648 vs 2282 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 vs 418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 vs 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 vs 3977 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5970
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- 3.1x more pipelines: 2x 1600 vs 1024
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3454 vs 1123
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3213 vs 2678
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3454 vs 1123
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3213 vs 2678
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1600 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 2,460 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3454 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3213 vs 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3454 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3213 vs 2678 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | ATI Radeon HD 5970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3648 | 2282 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17652 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | 3213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 | 3213 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | ATI Radeon HD 5970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Baffin | Hemlock |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 18 November 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 611 | 614 |
Price now | $259.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 305 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 2x 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |