AMD Radeon R9 350 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 1123
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 1123
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 2678
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 2678
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 2678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 2678 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17716 vs 9892
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5431 vs 2609
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5431 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17716 vs 9892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9892 | 17716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 2678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 2678 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3629 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | GCN 4.0 |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 10 November 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 610 | 611 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Code name | Baffin | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Price now | $259.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
ATIFireGL V3100
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
