AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- 2x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 2,867 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9309 vs 7988
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9309 vs 7988
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 31 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 vs 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 vs 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3699 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Tahiti |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 31 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 403 | 527 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |