AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs ATI Radeon HD 4650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and ATI Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 48 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 245 vs 239
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 68 vs 32
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1891
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1891
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 February 2015 vs 10 September 2008
Core clock speed 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 48 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 245 vs 239
PassMark - G2D Mark 68 vs 32
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1912 vs 1891
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1912 vs 1891

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650

  • 3.4x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 179.2 gflops
Texture fill rate 19.2 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 320 vs 128
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops vs 179.2 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
245
239
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
68
32
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1912
1891
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1912
1891
Name AMD Radeon R2 Graphics ATI Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark 245 239
PassMark - G2D Mark 68 32
Geekbench - OpenCL 7324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1912 1891
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1912 1891

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics ATI Radeon HD 4650

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 TeraScale
Code name Beema RV730
Launch date 27 February 2015 10 September 2008
Place in performance rating 1587 1585
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 700 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 179.2 gflops 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 128 320
Texture fill rate 5.6 GTexel / s 19.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 48 Watt
Transistor count 930 million 514 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 193 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Memory type System Shared GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 22.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz